DHHS Logo
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
The Center for Mental Health Services
Top Corner of Graphic Bottom of masthead graphic
 PATH Home Text Overview of the PATH program photo for right side of masthead
  PATH Text & link to home page Program Information
  Technical Assistance
  masthead bottom PATH Grantees
  technical assistance header
 corner of graphic
space

"Employing Persons with Mental Illness Who are Homeless"
April 2000 teleconference call,

A Transcript of the
PATH National Teleconference Call
April 18, 2000
Moderator: Gary Shaheen

For additional information, please contact:
Advocates for Human Potential (AHP),
500 Central Ave., Albany, NY 12206, (518) 453-2255.

Table of Contents

Welcome and Introductory Remarks

Comments: Michael English
Comments: Michael Hutner

 

Panelist Presentations

Introductions
LAMP - Los Angeles, CA
Lakeside SRO - Chicago, IL
Center for Urban Community Services - New York, NY

Question and Answer Session

Closing Remarks


Employing Persons with Mental Illness Who are Homeless

I. Welcome and Introductory Remarks

Welcome, everyone, to another PATH national teleconference. My name is Gary Shaheen and I'm from Advocates for Human Potential (AHP) in Sudbury, MA, the technical assistance contractor for the PATH Program. I will be serving as your moderator for today's call. We are pleased that you have decided to join us in one of our series of national teleconference calls designed to provide information and technical assistance to programs serving individuals who are homeless and have mental illness. Today's call will focus on issues and practical strategies for employing persons who are homeless and have mental illness. Before we begin, I would like to review the format for the call:

Dr. Michael English, Director of the Division of Knowledge Development and Systems Change at the Center for Mental Health Services, and Dr. Michael Hutner, PATH Government Project Officer, are joining us for today's call. Each will provide brief opening remarks that underscore the tremendous nationwide interest in increasing employment for persons with psychiatric disabilities who are homeless. I will then introduce our three panelists: Mollie Lowery of LAMP, Inc., Nancy Isaac of Lakefront SRO, and Andrea White of the Center for Urban Community Services. Each panelist will have 20 minutes to address the topics that were contained in the announcement you received. After the presentations, we will use the remaining time to open the lines for questions and comments from the audience.

A. Comments from Michael English

I must say that it really is exciting to hear that so many people have joined this teleconference, and I want to thank Mike Hutner who has stimulated the work that has been done to get this to happen. I am also very excited about the topic.

We are completing a five-year employment intervention demonstration here at the Center for Mental Health Services, and while we don't have all the findings in yet, it is clear to us that we really do have quite high expectations for employment for persons with serious mental illness. If you couple the work that we have done around the supportive intervention for helping people get work, with the tremendous gains we've made in learning about how to engage persons who were homeless and get them linked with services, I think we have very high prospects. Furthermore, I wanted to emphasize that we are hopefully going to be in a position to provide increasing amounts of information about supported employment techniques.

One of the things we are learning is that there is no single answer, that there are at least several models, including individualized placement services, (IPS), clubhouse model, and other program variations that demonstrate effectiveness with respect to employment. We are also working on developing treatment guidelines in the area of supported employment that will be a useful resource to you as you think about how your community can increase its expectations for helping persons with serious mental illness return to work.

I don't want to underestimate the challenges that this involves. We are learning that, while work is available, it is still, unfortunately, almost universally available at minimum wage. For a start, that's great, but I think we can do better in terms of affording persons with mental illness opportunities that extend beyond minimum wage work. There is also much work to be done in terms of helping people explore alternative means of work when they can't work full-time.

Dr. Hutner mentioned to me that you would probably like to hear more about money, so I will say a bit about funds available for employment. We have a particular grant program called the Community Action Grant that allows sponsors of exemplary practices, of which these employment models would be included, to sponsor the implementation to those models in target communities around the country. Anyone on this phone call can be a sponsor. The grant is used to fund development of an implementation plan for a necessary adaptation of a service strategy. It can also be used to develop a long-term financing strategy.

The Community Action Grant Program is now on the street. We have converted it from a guidance for applicants to a program announcement, which means it will have a rolling application that you can apply for at any time. We hope to have two or three periods where we collect applications and make grant awards. The current grant application closes on May 10th. The next one will be September 10th. I doubt you will make the May 10th if you haven't already completed your application, so target September 10th if you want to sponsor work on supported employment in your community.

As I said, we are very excited about this. The Presidential Task Force on Employment for Persons with Disabilities is giving us visibility on this issue. I think that this is one of those topics that communities are ready for, and I know that you will be an instrumental part of taking advantage of the learning and opportunities that currently exist. I'm looking forward to hearing these presentations about what's being done in the various communities.

B. Comments from Michael Hutner

I want to begin by thanking Gary for assembling this phone call. You have been in the forefront of activity regarding employment and raising the visibility and the importance of employment intervention. So I wanted to thank you personally for your expertise. I want to also thank Richard Becker, and others at AHP for the fine technical assistance they have been providing.

We at the Center for Mental Health Services and Homeless Programs Branch want to help you by providing technical assistance in this and other areas, and so I would invite you, after this phone call, to provide feedback directly to Gary. Let him know your views about this particular phone call- what parts of it you found particularly interesting-- and we will do what we can to provide you with more technical assistance.

For example, AHP puts together site visits so that if you want to implement the employment intervention, but need some expertise in helping you do this, we would do our best to make experts available to conduct site visits. Somewhat less intensive on resources, yet perhaps just as effective, would be the provision of advice through a teleconference call to your particular state. For instance, if you want to put together a group of providers in your state or surrounding regional area, we could make expertise available via telephone for an hour or two.

You may also want to exchange ideas with others on the phone call, to tap into the expertise of those who have made better headway on employment or those who are implementing various types of programs. We can arrange a conference call to discuss some of these employment interventions with those who are further along in planning. If you have a very specific question or set of questions, AHP can also coordinate conference calls. On this and other topics, we are trying to be as responsive as we can in providing you with technical assistance that will make a direct difference in your programs.

Gary: Thank you so much, both of you, for your great words. And now I would like to begin the presentations by our panelists. It gives me great pleasure to introduce our speakers for today's teleconference on employing persons who are homeless and have mental illness.

II. Panelist Presentations

A. Introductions

Mollie Lowery is the founding executive director of LAMP, Inc., a drop-in center and crisis shelter safe haven located in the skid row area of downtown Los Angeles, for adults diagnosed with serious mental illness who are homeless. Approximately seventy percent of those persons served by LAMP are addicted to or abusing drugs and/or alcohol, and fifteen percent are diagnosed with HIV or AIDS. By pioneering the Harm-Reduction model with intervention and building a strong lifelong supportive community, Ms. Lowery has guided the development of LAMP's forty-eight bed Village Transitional Residence, four business enterprises, and a fifty-unit apartment building. LAMP has grown into a fully contained continuum of housing, recovery, and employment services with a commitment to include prior guests of LAMP as members of their staff.

Nancy Isaac is the employment director for Lakefront SRO Corp., a non-profit, community-based housing development agency located in Chicago. During the past year, Ms. Isaac has developed written procedures for the employment program and has helped open Lakefront's second training and employment center serving residential and non-residential clients on the south side of the city. Currently, Ms. Isaac is arranging with the City Colleges in Chicago to operate certificate training programs and an accelerated GED program at the center. In addition, she is working with other providers to coordinate pre-employment and employment services, and is developing partnerships with area employers such as the Public Housing Authority and Employment Training programs.

Andrea White is an associate director at the Center for Urban Community Services in New York City where she has worked since 1980. Ms. White has designed and developed a nationally recognized program serving homeless and low-income people with mental illness and other special needs. In 1991, she participated in the design and development of a supportive services program at the Times Square Hotel, a six hundred and fifty-two unit permanent residence, serving both low income and formerly homeless people, including two hundred people with mental illness, fifty people with HIV/AIDS, and numerous tenants with addictive disorders. This award-winning program was the subject of a Sixty Minutes segment highlighting supportive housing as a solution to homelessness. The Times Square Hotel is recognized for its extensive employment and vocational services which offer supportive housing residents throughout New York with a wide range of job opportunities in a variety of fields. I am pleased to welcome our three panelists and ask Mollie Lowery to begin.

B. LAMP - Los Angeles, CA

Mollie Lowery: I want to start out by just talking about who we are and the services we provide. LAMP provides a continuum of housing, recovery, and support services to people who are homeless and diagnosed with a serious mental illness, most of whom are also dealing with drug addictions, and an additional proportionate number with AIDS or HIV.

In operation since 1985, LAMP grew out of the homeless and housing movements. We are based in LA's skid row district, a forty-square block area that, through city policy, has been preserved to provide for the housing needs of the city's homeless. One of the major results of that city policy is that we have what has now been called in national papers, the Open Asylum for persons with mental illness and the dually diagnosed. Approximately ten thousand people in this forty-square block area live in the streets, SRO's, or other kinds of housing. About thirty percent of these individuals are considered to be seriously mentally ill.

Our goal in creating LAMP was to establish a community, given that we felt strongly that the folks out there on the streets were seeking some kind of freedom, respect, and tolerable treatment for their mental illness. They wanted safety, and they wanted community like we all do. They wanted a home and friends to love and to invest in. To address those fundamental needs, we have evolved into what we call a lifelong non-linear continuum of housing and comprehensive support recovery services.

We service about fifteen hundred individuals each year and have a community of staff and guests of nearly five hundred who are participating in the LAMP programs and housing at any given time. Of our nearly ninety-five employees, sixty-four are full-time. Of those sixty-four, fourteen are guests of LAMP, while another seventeen staff are people who are dually diagnosed.

We conduct a huge volume of street outreach, and since Los Angeles has the wonderful recognition of having the largest mental institution in the country-- our county jail-we provide outreach to those persons as well. We also operate a safe haven drop-in center shelter with thirty beds, and a transitional residence with forty-eight beds. In the same building as our transitional residence are our three businesses that are part of our employment program, which I will get very specific about in a minute. We also have a fifty-unit apartment building that serves as our permanent housing component. In addition to that permanent housing, we have ten units that we are master leasing from another non-profit housing provider and that will be expanded to twenty-six units so we have more permanent housing available. So, clearly, housing is a very important part of what we do. LAMP also has a forty- acre ranch about five hours away that is used as a retreat and recovery center. We operate as a fully comprehensive harm-reduction model, which includes our housing and other services. No one is excluded from housing, services, or employment because they are using or are decompensating.

We operate three businesses at LAMP. The largest is a commercial laundry that we have operated since 1990. We own and service the inventory of sheets, towels, blankets, etc., and we rent out that inventory to all the big, non-profit housing providers down here on skid row, as well as to a number of recovery homes and large shelters. It's a fairly large operation, which employs about twenty-five of our guests. There's lots of machinery involved, and a lot of work to do. We service three thousand housing units, and just this year, we started covering those costs with the income from the business itself without subsidy. We are currently establishing a reserve fund to help replace some of the old machines.

We also operate a coin-op laundry -- the only one in this forty square block area. It's your standard laundromat, open to the public, and it is completely staffed by LAMP guests. What we affectionately call "The Pits" is our public toilets and showers operation, also staffed by LAMP guests. For our area, this is a very needed service. We have coin-op showers, and it costs forty cents for a ten- minute shower, which includes a towel and soap. The showers operate seven days a week, ten hours a day, as does the laundromat. The toilets, of course, are free.

Our businesses were able to get started because of a pretty hefty grant from Robert Wood Johnson Foundation back in 1989/90, which helped subsidize the first three years. The Community Redevelopment Agency Continues to subsidize our public showers and toilets.

A unique element of our employment efforts is that we hire people from our guest population to serve as outreach workers, food service workers, and case managers. Fourteen full-time staff falls into that category, some of whom started out by working part-time in our small businesses. As they developed the trust and confidence that they could really work and depend on that work for income, they went on to become what we call regular full-time employees, versus guest employees who work part-time in our businesses.

Having given you that overview, I want to address some of the questions. Where we see special needs regarding being homeless and mentally ill, and trying to work, or have jobs that accommodate them. First, money is definitely a motivator. It matters to people that they have paying jobs, that they have a job description or something they can call themselves, and they can feel proud about going to work and having a regular schedule.

They need a lot of flexibility because their lives are still going up and down, both because of their mental illness and because of their housing status, which may be changing over time. Most of the people that we employ are housed in our flexible continuum of housing, which makes all the difference in the world in their success at staying employed. You have to have a lot of diversity in skill level expectations and levels of responsibility so people can be accommodated according to what they can bring to the job. You also need to have really clear expectations and policies regarding drug use and the type of behavior people need to be accountable for when they come to work.

We have a policy that people are able to quit because of any factor that they see as a need. They may be too stressed out or too ill to work, or they may be using drugs too heavily to work, so they quit, but unless they have done something very badly on the job itself, they can always return to that job. We do a lot to buoy up the possibility that they can keep the job by providing support groups and strong case management to help them through the transitions they are making. We try to help people really understand what freedom is really about-that there is an equation there- that freedom and responsibility have to be matched, and that part of coming in off the streets and letting go of some of that freedom is taking on some responsibility for their lives, jobs, income, and everything else.

I have made a clear distinction that housing is very, very important regarding our kind of work here. If they are going to keep their job, they need to be housed and that's why at LAMP we are so strong in our mission to provide housing in every shape and fashion that we can. It's a package deal. I think it is absolutely essential.

And as to the benefits of and how work impacts motivation, versus how SSI benefits motivate or don't motivate their working, we have to do a lot of work on that. SSI, of course, is something they really depend on, and to let that go is a big deal. A lot of our folks choose to work part-time and stay on SSI and not make that huge leap into permanent full-time employment. They just don't have enough hope. For the ones that have, it has been exhilarating and wonderful for them, and each time someone else does it, it is a model for the rest to try it, and have trust and faith in LAMP being here for the long haul to provide them with a real sense of worth. We do a lot of reporting to the Social Security Administration so there aren't overpayments.

C. Lakefront SRO-- Chicago, IL

Nancy Isaac: Lakefront SRO Corp. is a non-profit, community-based housing development agency located in Chicago. Our organization was founded in 1986, and we currently provide permanent, affordable, supportive housing for approximately nine hundred homeless, low- income men and women in eight apartment buildings on Chicago's north side.

This January we opened our new south-end apartments and our job training and employment center. The training center houses our building maintenance, construction, and computer training labs, classroom for our literacy and GED programs, a resource library, and a lecture hall that holds large training sessions by the City College system. We offer affordable, safe, and well-maintained apartments along with a variety of support services for our tenants to assist them in becoming independent. We have case managers and property managers working in each of our buildings. Among the other services offered are tenant councils, recovery support services, and our employment training program, which is comprised of a literacy program, job readiness training, in-house training classes, assistance in securing employment, and ongoing support after program participants are employed.

Last year, fifty-seven percent of all of our residents were employed during some part of the year, and the range in salaries for our tenants was from $5.15 an hour up to $22.55 an hour; over seventy percent of our residents made between $5.15 and $8.00 an hour. Furthermore, fifty-seven percent of employed Lakefront tenants worked in laborer positions, while approximately forty percent worked in service positions, and three percent worked in professional positions.

The City of Chicago's Mayor's Office of Work Force Development recently asked Lakefront to bring our employment program to residents in two Chicago Housing Authority developments. We have a two-year contract, and within that time frame our contract requires us to serve more than seven hundred CHA residents. The program will move participants through initial job skills assessment to job placement assistance and follow up employment counseling services. Tenants should also benefit from referrals that our staff will be making to ensure that, if needed, they receive appropriate medical care, mental health care, and recovery counseling.

The program has been in operation for five months now and our staff has met with four hundred and twenty CHA residents who have received career development assessments and counseling. To date, fifty individuals have entered short-term training programs in areas such as cabling and fiber optics, graphics, and construction and building maintenance programs. Fifty-five people have been placed in jobs with the average wage at right around $7.50 an hour.

At Lakefront, we estimate that about forty percent of our residents are dealing with mental health issues. So, we are not dealing with as large a population of folks who are dealing with mental health issues as LAMP is. We find that residents who have an identified mental illness tend to be more isolated and have fewer support systems in place. Lakefront has developed partnerships with a number of area community mental health centers where individuals participate in outpatient therapeutic programs, and on occasion, residents are also admitted to in-patient treatment programs.

We provide the same set of support and employment services to all our residents, regardless of whether they have a mental illness or not. Our case management, property management, and employment staff work closely together and meet regularly to address tenant issues as they arise before they become major problems. In addition, Lakefront staff has developed relationships with a number of organizations that provide vocational services for people with mental illness. Some of the organizations include the State's Office Rehab Services and private, not-for-profit organizations that provide training and supportive employment opportunities for people with mental illness. We are also looking into the possibility of developing an in-house business for people who are not able to work in conventional jobs.

At Lakefront, there is a natural tension between the principle of respecting our residents' privacy and their right to make their own decisions with a belief that everyone can contribute in some way to their community. In terms of our best practices model, Lakefront recently incorporated a new philosophy that supports the concept of work. We know that a number of our residents are not job ready or may never be able to hold down a job. However, they can participate in the community in some way, whether through participating in our voter registration drive, assisting a neighbor with grocery shopping on a weekly basis, or going to school to improve their literacy skills. The key that we found for participation in employment services is meeting with each individual to identify what his short and long-term goals are, and assisting the customer in defining the steps needed to attain those goals. A goal may be to be reunited with a family member or to move into a larger apartment, but often when people begin focusing on employment or getting involved with the Lakefront community, they begin addressing a number of their personal barriers, including working on conflict resolution, time management, hygiene, literacy, taking needed medication, and dealing with their mental health problems.

We find that there is definitely a link between longer housing retention and customers who work. Approximately fourteen percent of Lakefront's residents receive Section 8 housing subsidies and pay no rent. We estimate that thirty-three percent pay the rent using SSI or SSDI, and the rest need income to pay their rent. So, with this in mind, housing and employment are intricately connected for many of our residents here at Lakefront. We have found that many people receiving SSI and SSDI have issues related to work as well. Whenever possible, we assist those individuals in finding part-time jobs; we have also invited representatives from the local advocacy organizations to talk to our staff and residents about how they can work and still receive benefits. But it remains an uphill battle for us.

In terms of positive partnerships, we have recently developed a partnership with the City Colleges to provide short-term certificate training classes on-site at Lakefront's job training center. The classes are available for residents, as well as community members. The City Colleges work to identify industries with work force shortages, and work with companies to tailor the training programs to meet their specific needs.

The training programs are relatively short-term, and run usually somewhere between twelve and eighteen weeks. Companies participating in the program employ most of the graduates. Currently, the City Colleges are running cabling and fiber optics programs at Lakefront, and will be starting a bank teller program in the beginning of May. We are also looking at some additional programs, including a medical office assistant program, a consumer services representative program, and a word processing certificate program that would be run on-site.

What we really like about this collaboration is that, because the City Colleges have developed relationships with industries that have significant work force shortages, the industries have a real stake in the classes. In fact, members of the various industries participate in teaching the classes, and there are real jobs once folks successfully graduate from the program.

What Lakefront brings to the table is recruitment, not only from our buildings, but from Chicago Housing Authority buildings and a number of supportive housing organizations in the city who have untapped labor resources. Through our literacy program, we provide one-on-one tutoring, study groups, job readiness training, and ongoing support for folks once they have moved into their new jobs. The beginning pay for many of these jobs-- in fact all of these jobs-- is beyond minimum wage. Salaries range from $7.50 to $12.00 an hour for graduates of the City College programs. We also promote a number of local training programs, including a twelve-week professional culinary training program for jobs in the hotel industry, available for welfare-to-work and non-custodial parents. A machinists training program and a woodworking training program are available to these individuals as well.

Lakefront is committed to developing partnerships with other organizations that provide vocational services and supportive employment opportunities to people with mental illness and people with developmental disabilities, and we are currently working on other ways to collaborate with organizations that serve people who are homeless. Right now, we are working with a local organization that provides job readiness training and employment support to people in shelters and transitional housing. They are providing a four-week intensive job readiness training class for our residents, and, based on the outcome of the class, we may be developing a long-term relationship with this organization, which will enable us to really focus on what we feel we do best.

Our tenants are also taking advantage of some training programs that other supportive housing organizations are providing, such as the Chicago Industrial League, which has a building maintenance/janitorial program, and also a landscaping program. We continue to develop relationships with area employers to secure jobs for our customers. Through our relationships with fifty employers, we pre-screen individuals to provide them with pre-employment training. It might be job readiness training, or it may be some support in math or reading skills to get people up to a minimum level where they would quality for a job with an employer. We then provide ongoing support for individuals once they are employed.

We contact our customers fifteen, thirty, ninety, and a hundred-twenty days after they are employed to check in with them, to make sure things are moving along as hoped, and, in the event that problems arise, to intervene before they become real issues. With those organizations or companies that we have relationships, we will also contact them on regular intervals to check in and make sure they are satisfied with their Lakefront employees.

We have a partnership with the City of Chicago's Mayor's Office of Work Force Development (MOWD) to provide funding for our employment program and our in-house construction and building maintenance programs. I mentioned earlier that they have asked us to provide services to residents of two Chicago Housing Authority developments, and that's a two-year contract. The Illinois Department of Human Services provides funding to Lakefront to pay for training of non-custodial parents for jobs in the hotel industry. We anticipate receiving a grant from the Illinois Secretary of State to help fund our literacy program, which will be expanding to include an accelerated GED class, not only for our residents but for people in the community, as well. We will also be providing one-on-one tutoring to residents of several shelters in the Chicago area.

We have applied for a grant with the City of Chicago's Department of Planning for employment services, and should be hearing in a couple of months whether we will be receiving the funds. We also receive about $43,000 in funding for employment programs through various foundations.

D. Center for Urban Community Services - New York, NY

Andrea White: The Center for Urban Community Services operates a variety of programs, ranging from street outreach to two transitional programs called Therapeutic Living Communities for people who are mentally ill-one designed for those who may be long term shelter users or those living on the streets-and one for women who have been in a shelter for a long time.

The 350 Lafayette Program operates on a six-month time frame, and our Harlem Transitional Program operates on about a twelve-month time frame for people in the streets or long-term shelter users. In addition, we provide the social services in six SROs, five in the uptown SROs in partnership with a group called Broadway Housing that does development and manages the buildings, and the Time Square and the Prince George. Prince George is our new four hundred and eighteen-unit building on 28th Street in Manhattan. We have a hundred people who have mental illness, forty-five with HIV, seventy from the general shelter system, about thirty from the streets, and the remainder are low-income people who make between fifteen- and thirty thousand dollars a year.

As mentioned, we also operate an extensive vocational program for people in supportive housing, and people in Tier Two Shelters, which are transitional shelters for homeless families, and particularly in our own program. In addition, we run a technical assistance training unit with contracts from HUD and HOPWA (Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS) that provides training and designing of supportive housing throughout the country.

One of the things that I wanted to talk about is the adaptations that are necessary for people with mental illness who are homeless to really participate fully in vocational or employment programs, or to get a job, and I think it is really, as Mollie said, sort of a context for our services. I think you have to be aware of how homelessness affects people's lives.

Our consumers have been in a prolonged period of crisis. Their priorities and coping strategies may be dramatically different than the skills that are needed to either maintain housing or participate in work. They have a sense of being cut out. They have limited options, and I want to pick up again on what Mollie said about hope. People are really missing hope. They believe that there are limited resources available to them and that they probably won't have access what is available. I also think that mental illness affects people's lives in different ways, and that you have to look at how the mental illness affects their lives-for example, if people are stabilized, if they are not stabilized, how they deal with mental illness, and what sort of help they have gotten in the past. Those all have to be factored into the kind of services that we provide.

Our housing and transition programs are designed around people reaching their life's goals, including those related to starting a career. We identify the skills to help them achieve those goals and help them begin to think about what it takes to work, including literacy skills. Those are all part of what people need to maintain housing, and are really part of what a case manager would be doing with somebody-identifying goals and barriers, and helping people reach those goals.

So what we've done is broken down the types of jobs that we want integrated into our services as full service case managers. We also provide something a little different. It is called Cognitive Remediation, and theory is that people with mental illness, have cognitive deficits. Because they were engaged in other things at the time when they might have developed those cognitive skills--notably late adolescence/early adulthood--they may be missing some of those focus skills. They may have difficulty in transferring their thoughts and ideas to another person, in setting priorities, in organizing, and in thinking things through.

Cognitive Remediation is a program developed specifically for people with a history of schizophrenia and/or substance abuse. We were beginning to see where people, particularly those with mental illness, weren't getting through the vocational process. The problem was mostly around those skills like focusing and taking direction, being able to apply one thing to the other. This program addresses those cognitive needs by using a computer and games on the computer that teach people those skills. Another component involves one-on-one identification of which skills they are working on and how those skills can be transferred.

I also think there needs to be a consistency across programs. People who are homeless or were formerly homeless, need to know they can depend on the program. They need to know they are there for the long term, and there needs to be very good communication between the case management and vocational programs. And, of course, there needs to be housing. People need to have a safe place to be. It's very difficult to concentrate on other tasks when you are wondering where you are going to sleep at night, and how you going to get money, and housing really goes arm-in-arm with employment. So literacy training is also important in the intervention. People need the skills to access jobs, and if they are going to engage in a career plan, as opposed to a one step thing. They need those skills to address that.

The outcomes of this are very important, too. You can't do a training program, or you can't work with people towards employment unless they know their outcome, and they really have to be able to control some of the outcomes. Towards that end, we started with in-house businesses. We have a partnership shop with Ben & Jerry's; the shop was donated, and is run by tenants in our building. We also have a thrift shop, again run by tenants in our building. Remember, these are also retail jobs that are somewhat difficult for people, particularly people who don't have great social skills. So one of the things we did was develop something called Beadworks, a tenant-owned jewelry design cooperative. People are paid by how much they work, and we actually sell to high-end designers. These are tasks that people can do in their rooms or in a group. It is very flexible, and that has worked quite well. We are developing a decorative arts program towards the same end. There are many people with very good artistic talents. So the lobby of one of our buildings has been registered as a gallery where we sell art. We have openings every month, and that has been very effective.

Because businesses that are on-site and are run by the agency are very intensive in terms of staff time, we have rented out commercial space with a proviso that they hire twenty-five percent of their employees from supportive housing, and we made that deal with Starbucks and other businesses, and we are opening a restaurant that will have the same deal. We also have contracts with the Business Improvement District, which has been incredibly supportive to us.

We operate a business called Time Square Delivers, subsidized by the BID, which picks up donations from people in the district and delivers them to not-for-profits. Because this involves so much driving, we have made a link to our commercial driving program and people can graduate into that. We also run a laundry. We have some agency specific training with a number of industries: Marriott Hotels provide training and placement; Phoenix Recycling provides cleaning of offices, training, and placement; and Home Depot offers placement. Since they have a large number of stores or, in terms of Phoenix Recycling, contracts, there are opportunities for very flexible employment. There's a lot that people can do within that flexible structure, and if they do well in these training programs, they can move up the career ladder. These training programs are all run in partnership with Common Ground, our employment program collaborator.

The other barrier to employment that I wanted to talk about involves not just outcomes, but money. We have an entitlement specialist as part of the jobs program and also as part of all our case management programs so that we really keep on top of this to make sure that people have all the information in order to make informed decisions. An issue that has been of concern for us is medical insurance and when people want to come off entitlements. We have been lucky enough to get a grant from HUD that pays for medical insurance for a limited amount of time as individuals come off entitlement. As we all know, psychiatric medications are very expensive. It is unacceptable to deny access to those medications when someone is starting employment.

As I mentioned earlier, the most important partnership in the jobs program is the one with Common Ground. They do a lot of the development, while we do a lot of the vocational services. We do the business development together, and the most important thing is that we get ideas from each other and can identify our differing perspectives and where the barriers are. We also work with HUD and they provide us with funding. The Division of Mental Health and the State Office of Mental Health (OMH) have made a real commitment to fund employment. Interestingly enough, OMH has put together a State VR (Vocational Rehabilitation) /OMH Collaboration where, after the first six-month period of job counseling and support funded by VR, OMH will pick it up for persons with mental illness. People need help to get to the next step; they need to know somebody is absolutely there for them. We have also worked with the Corporation for Supportive Housing (CHS), as part of Next Step Jobs initiative, to get some money, but also to participate in a group that talks about employment opportunities, much like what we are doing today, and that's has been incredibly helpful.

Gary: Thank you so much. In listening to all three of you, there are two things I see. The first is that there is no one cookie cutter approach-- that the menu needs to be broad, wide and flexible-and the second is a challenge to the traditional concept of readiness: particularly presenting the option of work at the earliest opportunity.

III. Questions and Answer Session

Q:I am most interested in the cognitive remediation. How would I find out more about it? Can Andrea talk more about that right now?

A: Sure. The person's name is Alice Medalia and she's from Nathan Kline (contact info for Dr. Alice Medalia: 718-920-7311, e-mail: amedalia@aol.com). She developed cognitive remediation from some of the cognitive work that people have done with traumatic brain injuries, but found that, especially with people who are schizophrenic and who people who use substances, that the cognitive deficits were developmental as opposed to all in one time, and they may not have had real strong functioning before they developed the cognitive deficit. This program is built around specific cognitive deficits that you develop around late adolescence/early adulthood, addresses them, and helps people, as I said, with focusing skills, transferring skills from one thing to another, mediation skills, how to express themselves, and how to negotiate. It has been very successful. The other thing I want to mention is the tenants here absolutely love it and, because it is all computer-based, they also develop a mastery on the computer, and really feel good about that and what they are learning. It's hard to get them out of the room at the end of the session, and people really look forward to the next one. They are very proud, which, to me would have been enough on its own. I mean, people's faces light up when they go in there.

Q: We are a middle hospital and run a work therapy program. We have just recently started doing what we call critical job skills-- a pre-employment class- and it is pretty successful. We also have a definite need for literacy and have been looking for some adult-based computer tutorials. Did you have a resource?

A: (Andrea) The computer-based stuff we are doing is mainly around cognitive remediation and, again, I would be glad to get you that information. We are also under contract with Laguardia Community College's School of Continuing Education, which is developing an employment contextualized literacy program designed to raise people's literacy skills about two grade levels. It's a twenty-five week course, nine hours a week, and that's really how we are addressing it. We have got some computer stuff, but we are hoping that this course-- because it is employment contextualized, and that's really hard to find-- might be helpful to us. Once that's developed this fall, we would be happy to share some of that information with people.

(Nancy) We found that computer programs don't work for our customers. Most of those who have literacy issues are not comfortable with computers. We do have a computer program and a literacy program, but we've found that one-on-one tutoring and the classes that folks take both in-house in community-based literacy programs, is what really works for our residents. Also, I forgot to mention earlier that one of the things we started in several of our buildings is consumer-run book clubs, specifically Oprah Book Clubs. As many of you probably know, Oprah Winfrey is in Chicago, so we are hoping that once we get these Oprah Book Clubs up and running, that we can go to Oprah and ask for some funding for our literacy program. But people really like the book clubs, as well, and folks choose what books they want to read and discuss.

Q: Although I am a consumer, I have my Masters and was asked to teach a job club. On my first day, being all excited, I found that all my clients were SSI people and had never worked. All my lesson plans went down the drain.

A:(Andrea) I think that people on SSI will talk about wanting a job, but especially if they have never worked, they may not know how to develop a career plan. Sometimes you have to start with that; and, if you can develop lesson plans around what the career plans are, and help people develop their skills for the kind of jobs that they want, even if that is far into the future, you can begin to talk about interim jobs. You can begin to talk about how they can apply those skills to other things. I think it is difficult when people are first considering employment to do it as a structured class unless that has really been identified as a skill that they need to reach their goal. So it's sometimes helpful to talk with them about what they want.

(Mollie) On that issue, I think most people who are on SSI and have been all their lives, haven't had the experience of working, or don't have a sense that that possibility is there for them. It's not just on their side of the situation, but also on the side of the employers. It isn't just a matter of the person being ready to work; it's also a matter of the employers having the accommodations for them to work, which allow some flexibility for when they are not well, allowing for the insurance that they need, and all of that. But this whole panel is about homeless folks who are mentally ill. Since SSI is the only thing that has kept them above water for so long, they need not just a class on careers, but the opportunity to actually do hands-on work, which might be part-time for a long period of time until they really gather the hope and courage to go beyond that.

(Nancy) At Lakefront, we define employment broadly. Our mission is to get people engaged, and we know that not everybody who lives at Lakefront will hold down a conventional job. We want people to have as much control over their lives as possible, and so we don't define their goals for them. What we're working to do is to get people engaged somehow, to get them involved. It is our job to work with each tenant to identify short- and long-term goals, and those goals may or may not include employment. So, for a number of our residents, employment is not the goal today, but it may be a foreseeable goal in the future.

Q: Is anyone doing direct placement of consumers when they ask to go to work rather than put them on any other kind of training path? Also, it sounds as if most providers are placing the mental health consumers in agency-based positions as opposed to competitive jobs, and we wanted some feedback about that.

A:(Mollie) At LAMP, most of our employment is agency-based, and I have to say it seems a very realistic approach for us right now. We are in a part of town, as I said, Skid Row, which is isolated in itself and is sort of the bottom of the barrel. Most of the folks that come into this area have been homeless most of their adult lives. For the folks that are mentally ill, it's all compounded with drug use, mental illness, and being homeless for all these years. It's not like a whole bunch of folks are running down here to ask for good employees, and so we are just trying to build a foundation for folks to move along on, to reconstruct their lives, both housing-wise and employment-wise so that they can, if they can get to that place, move from here. A few have, but not many. As I say, we work with a very severely mentally ill population, and the doors aren't extremely open for them from our experience. We are definitely working on that, but they can't account for all these years of not being employed. Even our most talented skilled people can't seem to get through those barriers so far.

(Nancy) We serve a very diverse group of folks here at Lakefront. We have people who come to us with very little education, people with graduate degrees, people with no work history, and people with a great deal of work history. Our employment services are voluntary, so, at a minimum, what we would do is to offer a career development assessment, which provides us with some information on the individual's work history, educational history, their skill sets, and potential barriers to employment. We then give the individual an opportunity to start identifying short and long-term goals. We would expect all individuals who participate in our program to at least complete that assessment, and then it's really up to the individual in terms of the kinds of services they want. We do have a job bank and so, if all that somebody wants is a job, and they are asking for assistance in finding that job, we will assist them. Regarding agency-based versus competitive positions, we don't make a clear distinction. We don't have separate paths for our customers who have mental illness and our customers who do not have mental illness. So there are folks who we place in outside employment who do have mental illness.

(Andrea) We also don't really differentiate and will do direct placement if that's what people want. If they have the skill level for it, we will do a full assessment with the tenants themselves. I don't think we do a lot of direct placement. Though I don't know the numbers for people who are mentally ill, I know we do a lot of competitive employment. It really depends, though, on exactly what people want, and what their skill level is. We also do a lot of work around ADA, get the adaptations that people need, and do a lot of education around that, and I think that is really important.

Q:One of things we are trying to do in Iowa is to work out some employment situations for mentally ill people. Your programs sound great, but how did you get started? We are in the beginning stages.

A:(Andrea) When we first got started, we didn't apply for grants. Most of the grants I saw-- and this was about ten years ago-- had a lot of time limitations, and I didn't want to make a commitment to a time limitation that would box in either the tenants or ourselves to meet a goal we weren't sure was appropriate. So we got started out of our case management money, and that was very helpful because it gave us all a chance to figure out the direction we were going in. We had a lot of sessions with consumers in our buildings and in our programs and continually asked them what they wanted. I had mentioned before that we have a grant from HUD to pay for medical insurance. That idea didn't come from us, but from the people in our programs. So, basically, we bought ourselves some time in the beginning. We just really diverted some of the funding towards employment and really listened to people, and that's how we built our programs. Eventually, we got other funding to build from there. We also got together with groups of other providers and talked to them about what they were doing.

(Mollie) We started with employment, once again, because the consumer population was saying they wanted it. They wanted access to jobs, and so we started creating them within our own agency because that was a no-brainer. We could do that. There were street outreach and advocacy jobs that we could offer folks, and then, of course, we wanted to diversify, and that's when we started thinking about starting our own businesses. And, yes, we did need some capital, some money to start these businesses, particularly the commercial laundry which involved a lot of equipment and expertise. We did find a foundation that was willing to put up some of the first few years of money to help us get started, but we sure had to show them we knew what we were doing, and have a market plan on how we were going to make it.

(Nancy) Our employment program was created much the same way. We spent a lot of time talking with our residents to find out what it is that they need from the organization, and employment kept surfacing. We were finding that many of the issues that the residents needed to be addressing-things like hygiene and developing relationships with people-those kinds of things were getting addressed through working on employment. I think Andrea mentioned she spends a lot of time talking to other organizations. We do the same, and we try not to duplicate services. We are working more and more in a collaborative effort with other supportive housing organizations so that we can concentrate on what it is that we do best, and let other organizations provide services to our residents in the areas where they are strong. So my suggestion would be to talk to other organizations in your locale and see what's out there, and where you might be able to develop some collaborations. In terms of funding, we have depended pretty heavily on foundations when it comes to covering the cost of our employment programs. We also have a grant from the city.

Q:How did you handle employment support, and what steps were taken to work with people once they were placed? Did you use job coaching, job shadowing, or on-the-job assistance?

A:(Andrea) We have job coaches, and that's a difficult position. Sometimes people don't want a job coach, and sometimes they do. So we have a real flexible model of that. We also conduct informal support groups, but I think the most important thing is we really involve the case management staff in any program that we are working on so that they can provide individualized support to people. The question of whether to go on the job or not can be very tricky. It is always important to have that available, but sometimes that creates a really uncomfortable situation for people. We also offer on-the-job training for supervisors, which has been very helpful to us.

(Nancy) We don't do job shadowing, but we have job coaches who work very closely, not only with our employee tenants, but also with our case managers and property managers who are on-site in the buildings. We have developed a number of relationships with area employers, so we will be in regular contact with the tenant and employer, when appropriate, to touch base, but we do not normally go on the site.

Q:Do you know the maximum amount of what SSI recipients are allowed to keep of their benefits once they earn wages?

A:(Andrea) Well, there are all sorts of changes in Social Security with the Work Incentives Act. We would be happy to send you something on that, if that would be helpful. (See www.ssa.gov, 'Legislative Bulletin 106-11, 11/9/99 - Ticket to Work').

Q:We were wondering, for all the agency-based placements, how do the different parts of the agency manage the relationships with consumers in staff roles? When they are in an employment role, are they receiving case management services, and what policies, or any other practices, have you developed to manage that role change and support services effectively?

A:(Mollie) We have definitely structured some policies. Like I said in my presentation, for the folks who are working part-time and are still receiving SSI, we deliberately have a category called Guest Employee for them, and there is a different statement of ethics and confidentiality that they sign. The personnel policies, however, for the agency apply to the Guest Employees in the same way as regular employees. Many of our Guest Employees live in our facilities and do receive case management and all the other services that we provide. The distinction we make is that where they work is always a separate site than where they live so that we can keep some of those roles separate, but it's something you have to really work very hard at and clarify. The weekly support group for Guest Employees really helps with that because, when things get confusing, they get to air that and have it straightened quickly. It's a constant education process, and it's a challenge, but it's a good challenge.

Q:Is that time limited, those Guest Employee jobs?

A:(Mollie) No. One can be a Guest Employee for years. We have got some who have been Guest Employees for nine years because they choose to stay in part-time employment and subsidize their SSI rather than take the plunge into full-time employment.

(Andrea) We also try not to hire people at the same site they are living at and also try to keep the differentiation. I mean, case management is case management, and employment should be employment. It's always tricky, the supervision role, particularly in social services, to keep it absolutely to employment. Frankly, I think it's really the same issue. It can be intensified when you hire people who are in your own programs or housing, but you really need to keep those roles separate. We also do some training on confidentiality and have tried hiring people in the same building, but that's very difficult for the other tenants in the building. So, we're finding we really need to separate those issues in order to do a good job.

(Nancy) Currently, thirty percent of Lakefront staff are tenants or past tenants, and I feel very strongly about that. It's very important for us to have hired residents, especially in employment. Folks who are tenants or past tenants become mentors for other residents and can reach tenants in a way that those who are non-residents just can't. The issue of confidentiality has come up, and we do not actually have a strict policy right now regarding tenants not working in the building where they live, but it is something that we are reviewing. I think the benefits far outweigh the problems. We also do training on confidentiality, and I agree with everyone that it can be tricky, but our residents who aren't employees are such an asset to the organization that I really can't see it running any other way.

Q:This is a quick question for Mollie. What does LAMP stand for?

A:(Mollie) LAMP, when it was first established, was the Los Angeles Men's Place, but in 1987, two years into operating, we changed it to LAMP because we were serving women as well as men. So it has been LAMP ever since.

Q:Is there a standardized assessment tool that you use to determine someone's employability? I know we get a real subjective view from our clients, but we often find that what they tell us isn't necessarily in agreement with what their abilities are.

A:(Andrea) We have an assessment tool that's standardized for our program. It's not standardized for anything else, but we would be happy to make that available to you.

Q:We come from a small mental health center, and we hire our own consumers from case management to janitorial positions. We have been in touch with the Village in Long Beach and I just wondered if the folks that you have there, do you have time limitations on some of the jobs and then look more to community outcomes, or is that part of your curriculum now?

A:(Andrea) We do have limitations. As Nancy had said, it's important to have flexibility, so we have all sorts of jobs. We have some that are not time limited, and we have some that are. One of the things we're moving towards, even in our case management services is-- in our new housing, for instance-that we don't have any groups. Groups tend to go on forever. What we have instead are classes where the curriculum is available up front and people know exactly what they are going to get out of it. We are definitely moving towards more outcome-based services where the people who participate are able to choose the outcome they want, and can see the steps towards it. I also think it is important to have some non-time limited slots where people can really stay there for a long period of time if they need to do that, and that's something that, for instance, OMH and VESID (our State VR) have really worked together to provide us with. So I think you need both. That's my personal opinion.

(Mollie) I feel real strongly that, for people who have been homeless for a very long time, their lives, even when they are in treatment, are transient. They are moving from program to program and place to place, and providing them with a job that isn't time limited really matters to them. They really sink their teeth into it and get a lot of pride out of being there. I have been doing this job for five years. It is really important to me that I can say that. They get lots of rewards for doing that, and it's about just building this foundation under them that they can really move from if and when they are ready.

(Nancy) I think, from Lakefront, none of the jobs that we make available are time limited. People can, once they are employed, stay in a position as long as they feel comfortable, as long as they meet the minimum qualifications and perform in their positions.

Q:We heard LAMP talk about harm-reduction and not having any prerequisites around sobriety. We would be interested in hearing what Lakefront and CUCS do with that in terms of employing people.

A:(Nancy) At Lakefront, if we know that somebody is actively using, and if the individual wants a job, we will assist them in getting a temporary job, but we will not assist them in getting a permanent position until they are actively addressing recovery issues. We do that for a number of reasons. One is that we are regularly developing relationships with employers and we value those relationships. We work very hard to find the right fit for individuals, and we want people who are moving into permanent positions to have some sense of security that they will not burn bridges and that they will be reliable. So, I guess that's mainly the reason why we would steer somebody who we know is actively using to a temporary position.

Q:Could each of you talk just briefly about your relationship in partnering with your state offices of vocational rehabilitation? What have been some of the challenges and some of the successes in getting vocational rehabilitation support for the consumers you are serving?

A:(Mollie) We haven't had much success. A few of our folks have gone through their program and gained some ground in terms of getting training, but not actually job placement. In terms of getting involved with voc rehab for our businesses and getting some kind of subsidized help, we didn't find that they had the flexibility that we needed in order to employ this population effectively. You had to be on a continuum that was exact. The intent had to be career and most of our folks are not on that career path.

(Nancy) We haven't had much success, either. There are a limited number of folks who go through a janitorial training program, which is run through the state's Department of Rehabilitation Services. We, too, have found that the program is rather inflexible for our residents, and our residents are, for the most part, I think, somewhat distrustful of large, bureaucratic organizations.

(Andrea) I think you have to look at the intake criteria and what people are able to provide, and the time frames, as we said, when you are looking at funding. We have had a lot of luck with our state VR (VESID), and one of the things that really improved our ability to use VESID is the partnership that they formed with OMH to provide ongoing support to people over a period of time. I think those kind of partnerships are very important, and the fact that OMH is really pushing employment has been a big help to us.

IV. Closing Remarks

Our thanks to Mollie, Nancy, and Andrea for a job well done, and also to Mike English and Mike Hutner for your remarks and comments. Please note that AHP, as a PATH technical assistance contractor, has the ability to provide a limited number of teleconference-based assistance sessions to PATH providers in your state, as Dr. Hutner indicated earlier. If you'd like to schedule a technical assistance teleconference on employment as a follow up to this call, please contact me, Gary Shaheen at (518) 453-2255, extension 243. Our thanks to everyone in the PATH network across the United States for joining us today.

   


Overview | Program Information | Technical Assistance | PATH Grantees
PATH Home | Contact Us
National Resource Center on Homelessness & Mental Illness Web Site
< Privacy Policy >


* PDF files require Adobe Acrobat Reader® installed on your computer.
Click here to download this FREE software from Adobe.

 
   


Last Updated: 05/19/2006 10:54 AM